Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. Despite being the best device in this review, we must tell that it's also notably older, a little bit thicker and way heavier. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite better pixel number in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.