Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 overall score. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 13 operating system. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely older and a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro. They have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a quite smaller display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.