Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a score of 98.9 against 81.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a little less pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.