Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Interstellar Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s 78.9 score. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because it has a higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, a little larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024). They have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.