Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a 98.9 score against 86.3. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but it's heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a quite smaller display and a quite worse pixels quantity per inch of display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution, a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Motorola Edge 50 Pro feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.