Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 87.1. Both phones we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way older and a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung made it just a little thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little worse display density, a little bit smaller screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. Both have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality images and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.