Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G 5G, getting a global score of 98.9 against 81.5. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G 5G, although both were released only a couple months apart. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, providing you some extra features and optimized performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better processing power than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit larger display and a greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a back camera with a lot higher resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 64 GB more internal storage.
Moto G 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.