Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Surfing blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Moto G 5G Plus, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 82.6. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a bit thinner but a bit heavier than the Moto G 5G Plus, and they were released only 1 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a little bigger display, a little bit better pixels number per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better video definition and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.