Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a score of 98.9 against 76. Both of these phones have the same Android 13 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an a lot older and a little heavier cellphone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung could make it thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because it has a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.