Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Moto G100's overall score of 88.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a bit heavier but thinner than the Moto G100, and they were released only a few months apart. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Moto G100 has Android 11 version.
The Moto G100 has a CPU that's very similar to the processor in Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although the Moto G100 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Moto G100, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit higher pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G100 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G100, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Moto G100 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.