Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G200 5G's general score of 86.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G200 5G has Android 11, so it provides the user some additional features. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and just a little heavier phone than Motorola Moto G200 5G, but Samsung made it just a little thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has a greater pixels amount in each inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.