Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Moto G30, getting a 11.76 score against 9.79. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Moto G30 were only released 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is just a little heavier but also thinner. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G30, because it has a quite larger display, a way higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a way greater screen density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit more storage for apps and games than Moto G30, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than Moto G30, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G30 counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better camera than Motorola Moto G30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a much better resolution camera in the back.