Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.66 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Baby Blue and Mineral Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 11.76, which is much better than the Moto G31's score of 9.66. These devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is an older and somewhat heavier device than the Moto G31, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Moto G31, because it has a little higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G31, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit faster processor than Moto G31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Moto G31 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Moto G31, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher video definition and a way better resolution back facing camera.