Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Moto G41's overall score of 79.1. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Moto G41 has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is a little bit thinner than the Moto G41, although it's somewhat heavier and was released just 18 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G41, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite larger display and a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Moto G41 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. Moto G41 counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior camera than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a lot higher 108 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.