Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto G60, having a 98.9 score against 79.5. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and Moto G60 has Android 11 version, providing some extra features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Moto G60, even when both of them were only released 8 months apart.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Moto G60, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better memory for games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G60 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G60, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 108 megapixels, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.