Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, having a 98.9 score against 76.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner device than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, although it's also heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit larger screen and a bit greater screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processing power than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, it also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery life than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.