Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Moto G71 5G, having a general score of 98.9 against 82.9. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and heavier than the Moto G71 5G, it's body is still a little bit thinner. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Moto G71 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a little bit more pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Moto G71 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.