Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.54 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting a score of 11.76 against 9.54. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Motorola Moto G8 Power were released with only a couple of months difference, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little larger screen and a little higher display pixel density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
