Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than the Moto G84's global score of 80.9. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 13 operating system. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really superior performance than Motorola Moto G84. They have 8 cores and a 12 GB RAM.
The Moto G84 has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little lower pixels density, a little smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Moto G84, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light images, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a lot more megapixels back camera. The Motorola Moto G84 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.