Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola Moto G9 Play's 76.7 overall score. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Motorola Moto G9 Play were released only 0 months apart, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is a bit heavier but also somewhat thinner. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a much greater display density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much better resolution camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory to install applications and games than Moto G9 Play, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Moto G9 Play features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.