Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 10.08 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than Moto G9 Plus, with a general score of 11.76 against 10.08. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 11 version while Moto G9 Plus has Android 10. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is thinner and a little lighter than Moto G9 Plus, although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processor than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because it has a little larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a way better video resolution.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features improved battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.