Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Moto G9 Power's global score of 78.6. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G9 Power, even when both were released only a couple of months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and way more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way more megapixels back camera. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G9 Power, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G9 Power counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.