Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.39 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.20 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 4.80 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1054.00 | $ 284.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 11.76, which is much better than Moto Z's 9.39 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 11 version and Moto Z has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is notably newer, but way heavier and incredibly thicker than Moto Z.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z, because although it has a little inferior pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto Z, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Moto Z, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Moto Z, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.