Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.55 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z Force, getting a global score of 11.76 against 9.55. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is much newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it is incredibly heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a 22% lower battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
