Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot newer than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's incredibly heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little faster processor than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 8 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher video definition and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.