Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is much newer, but notably thicker and a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, a much higher video definition, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.