Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.74 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Moto Z2 Play, with a 11.76 score against 9.74. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Play, it's way heavier and much thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger display, a just a little higher amount of pixels in each display inch and a much better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
