Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Moto Z3 Play, getting a score of 98.9 against 76.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way newer than the Moto Z3 Play, it's somewhat thicker and much heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting images in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much better resolution camera in the back and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.