Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola One Action's overall score of 78.5. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is heavier than the Motorola One Action, it's thinner and also newer. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Action, because it has a little bigger screen, a little better pixels density and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Motorola One Action's storage for apps and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one, both of them have an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a way better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.