Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue and Brown |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is newer and a bit thinner than Motorola One Vision's, although it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better display than Motorola One Vision, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a bit larger display and a little higher screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with improved battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 29% greater battery capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.