Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than the Motorola One Zoom's global score of 80. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and just a little thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a quite better number of pixels per inch of display, a better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.