Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than Motorola razr (2022)'s score of 81.1. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better cellphone than the Motorola razr (2022), it must be noted that it is also an older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Motorola razr (2022) has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better display than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a little bit bigger screen, more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and the Motorola razr (2022) both have really similar CPUs, and although the Motorola razr (2022) has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a back facing camera with way more MP, a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a much better video definition. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has improved battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.