Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 15 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 494 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a score of 98.9 against 79.2. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a lot more MP camera.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.