Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Nokia 9 PureView, having a score of 98.9 against 76.4. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is newer, but a little thicker and heavier than the Nokia 9 PureView. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1440 x 2880px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a much better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior memory for games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 36 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than Nokia 9 PureView, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.