Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 494 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Nokia XR20's overall score of 80.8. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older than the Nokia XR20, it's body is way thinner and notably lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, offering a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster processor than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better display than Nokia XR20, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a much bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a lot higher video definition.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than Nokia XR20, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.