Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is a lot better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little bit bigger display and more pixels per screen inch. Nubia Red Magic 3S's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with higher video frame rate, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.