Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Even being the best phone in this review, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is just a bit thicker and heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little lower pixels density and a quite smaller display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more memory for apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.