Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Ocean |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's score of 83.1. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is just a little bit heavier but also a little bit thinner. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance tweaks.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a quite higher pixel amount in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and 12 GB of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot higher video quality and a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.