Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo, we must note that it is also a just a little thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little lower pixel number per inch of screen, a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better performance than OPPO Find X3 Neo. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the battery life in Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is more expensive than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.