Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | -- |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, getting a 98.9 score against 76.2. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger display and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra one, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A16 5G features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.