Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A22, with a 98.9 score against 76.1. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and heavier than the Galaxy A22, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version, providing you some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.