Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.13 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1054.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A22, with a 11.76 score against 9.13. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should provide you identical OS features. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older and heavier than the Galaxy A22, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.