Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 494 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A22 5G, getting a global score of 98.9 against 84.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a little thinner than the Galaxy A22 5G, but it's just a bit heavier and was released about 10 months before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better video quality and a lot more megapixels camera. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.