Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is noticeably older and a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower display density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better video definition, a back facing camera with a lot higher 108 MP resolution and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.