Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.76 | 9.53 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, with a score of 11.76 against 9.53. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A30s's, although it is extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better processing unit than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. Galaxy A30s counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has just 4000mAh of battery size against 4500mAh.
