Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | -- |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A32 LTE Only's 82 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy A32 LTE Only has Android 11 version, giving you a couple additional features and better performance.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit smaller display and a bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much higher resolution camera and a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.