Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is way better than Galaxy A33 5G's 77.8 score. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Galaxy A33 5G, but it's heavier. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Galaxy A33 5G has Android 12 version, giving some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A33 5G, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior processor than Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back. The Galaxy A33 5G features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A33 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.