Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Galaxy A35 5G, having a 98.9 score against 79.4. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A35 5G, but they are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit bigger screen and more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A35 5G has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.