Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.64 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A5 (2017)'s score of 75.8. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy A5 (2017), but it is extremely heavier and just a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a much larger screen and a just a bit better pixel density.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot better camera than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much more megapixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot better video resolution. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.