Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-21 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's 86.6 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is newer than Samsung Galaxy A50s, it's a little thicker and heavier. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit better pixel density. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A50s, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera aperture, a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.