Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 13, 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 494 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.64 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy A52, with a 98.9 score against 90.7. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is just a little bit heavier but a little bit thinner than Galaxy A52, and both of them were only released 7 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 has a battery lifetime that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.